They say there's a lack of money. But what's really missing is a limit.
Every year, the narrative repeats itself: the budget is tight, the country is poor, the blanket is tight. And as always, the adjustment falls on those who work, undertake or consume. But when we look at the numbers — the expenses with institutional privileges, parliamentary assistance, electoral funds, travel, daily allowances, secret funds — the image is different: The Brazilian State is not poor. It is selectively generous.
Some lack, others have plenty
While millions live on less than R$2,000 per month, senators receive R$ 44 thousand net, with the right to housing assistance even if you own a property. While small businesses close due to excessive taxes, deputies create parliamentary fronts to defend privileged sectors. While the SUS suffers collapses, ministers fly in FAB jets for private commitments.
There is no lack of resources — what is lacking is desire to break with the logic that perpetuates institutional inequalities in the name of governability, tradition or convenience.
Brazil of selective austerity
When it comes to cutting costs, the proposals focus on:
- Social benefits (for the poorest)
- Investment in infrastructure (for the country to grow)
- Cuts in basic services (to “balance” the accounts)
But no one proposes cutting:
- Cabinet funds
- Party funds
- Free appointment positions
- State-owned companies with chronic losses
Because this would affect the functioning of the political machinery. And, as everyone knows, in Brazil, politics is untouchable.
The poverty speech is just for you
The state elite created a rhetorical shield: “you can’t do more with less” — unless that “less” is you.
And that is why Brazil continues to be a “poor” country where politicians travel in business class, spend R$200,000 on printing and approve salary increases above inflation — while the people ration rice and medicine.
English 
Portuguese